© Copyright 2004 by the Wyoming Department of Employment, Research & Planning
Occasional Paper No. 1
Evaluation of Federal Training & Education Programs
October 2004
A Comparison of Employment and Enrollment
Outcomes Based on Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families Eligibility
by: Mark
A. Harris, Ph.D., Sociologist, Research & Planning; Bev Potter and Lisa
Mixer, Co-Directors of Casper College ABE/GED Center; and Rick Burgin, M.S.,
Occupational & Adult Education Specialist, Casper College.
TANF eligible
participants progressing in their educational level but with fewer than 12 hours of
program participation experience employment and enrollment difficulties at a higher
rate than participants who are not TANF eligible. A smaller percentage of TANF eligible
participants experienced negative outcomes after GED completion than TANF ineligible
participants.
The Casper College ABE/GED Center provides instruction in
Adult Basic Education (ABE), General Educational Development (GED), English as a Second
Language (ESL), U.S. citizenship, employability skills, and educational assessment
services to individuals 16 and older who are out of school. The overall objective of
these services is to help improve academic functioning and increase employability
skills. The typical goal of Casper College ABE/GED participants is to earn their GED
certificate.
The Casper College ABE/GED program’s primary funding source originates from the Adult
Education and Family Literacy Act within the Workforce Investment Act (
Adult Education and Family Literacy Act, 1998). Outcome reporting for this funding
source follows National Reporting System (NRS) guidelines (National
Reporting System, 2001). The U.S. Department of Education uses the outcome
results provided by the NRS to justify federal investment in adult education programs.
The core outcome measures focus on employment acquisition and retention, educational
gain, placement in postsecondary education or training, and receipt of a secondary
diploma or GED.
The other major funding source for the Casper College ABE/GED program is a grant from
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Education and Training for Self-Sufficiency
(ETSS; Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Act, 1996). Funding from this source targets families who earn less than 185 percent
of the federal poverty guideline ($34,040 for a family of four in 2003;
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003). An ETSS grant provides funding
to the Casper College ABE/GED program for extended hours, additional sites, and support
to accommodate this targeted population. The performance goals of TANF are closely aligned
with the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (1998).
Study Purpose
Past research indicates that high school graduates have substantially lower unemployment
rates than those with only some high school education (Cantu, 2003).
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 2003 unemployment rate for persons 25
years and older with less than a high school diploma or GED was 8.8 percent compared to
5.5 percent for persons with a high school diploma or GED, 4.8 percent for persons with
some college, and 3.1 percent for persons with a Bachelor’s degree or higher
(2003). Completion of a GED also increases the probability of
employment for those without a high school diploma (Tyler, n.d.).
The data provide evidence that educational attainment is strongly associated with
employment. In addition to increased employment, another indicator of program success
is whether participants become enrolled in postsecondary education subsequent to ABE/GED
involvement.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Casper College ABE/GED participants
who are eligible for TANF have employment and postsecondary enrollment outcomes similar
to those who are not eligible for TANF at various levels of program progression, including
the completion of a GED.
Desired Outcome from the Study
The desired outcome of this study was two-fold. The Casper College ABE/GED Center needed
to determine program outcomes for stakeholders and to use the information gained from the
study to evaluate program strengths and difficulties, which will enhance efforts to retain
participants, refine instructional methodologies, and establish future performance goals.
Study Methods
In the past, ABE/GED staff relied upon telephone interviews to determine program outcomes
for Casper College ABE/GED participants. Unfortunately, telephone interviews have
historically resulted in low response rates, which prevent accurate outcome evaluations.
To better gauge whether the program has reached desired outcome goals, Casper College
ABE/GED administrators contracted with Research & Planning (R&P) to merge ABE/GED
participant data with Wage Records employment data and Casper College postsecondary
enrollment data to determine the employment and postsecondary enrollment outcomes of the
581 ABE/GED participants from program year 2001-2002. Postsecondary data available to
R&P contain all students enrolled in postsecondary education at Casper College. Wage
Records data represent a census of nearly all persons employed in the state (
Gosar, 1995).
The following outcome categories for TANF eligible and TANF ineligible participants
were developed by Casper College’s ABE/GED co-directors and staff:
For purposes of this research, the TANF eligible group is defined as ABE/GED participants
whose family income did not exceed 185 percent of the federal poverty guidelines. The other
group (TANF ineligible) is composed of ABE/GED participants who did not meet TANF eligibility
criteria.
ABE/GED participants in correctional programs were excluded from the analysis because they
do not have the same ability to pursue educational or employment goals as the general
ABE/GED population. English as a Second Language participants were also removed.
Results
The Table presents outcome data for all program year 2001-2002
participants in order of typical program progression (i.e., from ABE/GED participants
with minimal program contact to those who completed their GED).
All ABE/GED Participants
Approximately one-third (186) of the 581 program year 2001-2002 ABE/GED participants were
TANF eligible at time of enrollment (see Figure 1). Overall,
employment and enrollment outcomes were very similar for ABE/GED participants who were
TANF eligible and those who were TANF ineligible. Specifically, 55.4 percent of TANF
eligible participants and 54.2 percent of TANF ineligible participants experienced a
positive employment or enrollment outcome (see Figure 2).
ABE/GED Participants With Minimal Program Contact
Participants with minimal program contact are those who exited the program prior to
assessment to determine educational level (most in this category had fewer than four
hours of program participation). Eighty-eight participants (15.1%) of all participants
had minimal program contact (see Figure 3). A higher percentage
of TANF eligible participants (20.4%) had minimal program contact compared to TANF
ineligible participants (12.7%) in program year 2001-2002 (see Figure
4).
ABE/GED Participants Progressing Within Educational Level With Less Than 12 Hours of
Program Participation
Participants progressing in an educational level (Murray, 2004) that
have less than 12 hours of program participation comprise the largest segment of program
year 2001-2002 participants (254 or 43.7%; see Figure 3).
Although the number of TANF eligible participants (77) and TANF ineligible participants
(177) seems vastly different (see Table), the percentages of
TANF eligible and TANF ineligible participants in this category are within 3.4
percentage points of each other (41.4% and 44.8%, respectively). However, the data
indicate that TANF eligible participants progressing in their educational level but
with fewer than 12 hours of program participation experience employment and enrollment
difficulties at a higher rate than participants who are TANF ineligible (57.1% compared
to 48.0%; see Figure 5).
ABE/GED Participants Progressing Within Educational Level With At Least 12 Hours
of Program Participation
Fifty-three program participants (9.1%) progressed within their educational level and
had at least 12 hours of program participation (see Figure 3). About
an equal percentage of TANF eligible and TANF ineligible participants (52.6% and 50.0%,
respectively) in this category experienced a positive employment or enrollment outcome
(see Figure 6).
ABE/GED Participants Completing or Increasing One Educational Level
Few (21 or 3.6%) of the participants completed or increased one educational level (see
Figure 3). This excludes the 165 participants who had already earned their GED (see
Table). Because of the small number of participants in this
category, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the nature of the employment or
enrollment outcomes among TANF eligible and TANF ineligible participants. However, the
marginal totals seem to indicate that a higher percentage of participants who completed
or increased at least one educational level had at least a positive employment or
enrollment outcome (71.4%) in comparison to participants who progressed within
their educational level and had at least 12 hours of participation (50.1%).
ABE/GED Participants Completing GED
GED completion is the primary goal of most Casper College ABE/GED participants. Of the
581 ABE/GED participants, 165 or 28.4 percent completed their GED (see
Figure 3). Results indicate that GED completion appears effective in reducing the
number of participants with negative outcomes. More than half of all GED recipients
(63.6%) experienced a positive employment or enrollment outcome during the year after
GED completion (see Table). Additionally, the effect of
obtaining a GED on reducing the number of participants with negative outcomes
appears to be even stronger among TANF eligible participants. Specifically, a
smaller percentage of TANF eligible participants (27.7%) experienced negative
outcomes after GED completion than TANF ineligible participants (39.8%; see
Figure 7).
Conclusions
According to results presented in this study, Casper College ABE program participation
appears to assist TANF eligible participants in achieving positive employment and
enrollment outcomes relative to participants who are TANF ineligible. The effect
appears to be particularly strong among TANF eligible participants who have earned
their GED.
Participation in the initial stages (i.e., those making progress within an education
level but accumulating less than 12 hours of participation) appears to be associated
with negative outcomes (most likely employment difficulty at this stage) among TANF
eligible participants. The rigors of program participation may necessitate a
temporary withdrawal from or reduction in labor market activity for TANF eligible
participants. TANF eligible participants may have less family and social network
support to balance the requirements of work and school. This may also explain why
TANF eligible participants are more likely to experience minimal program contact.
Implications and Future Research
Positive benefits for TANF eligible participants appear to accrue with more ABE/GED
program contact. Additional monetary and staff resources devoted to the retention of
TANF eligible participants may reduce the number who leave the program with only
minimal contact. Casper College ABE/GED staff desire to test whether monetary
incentives may increase the length of time that TANF eligible participants remain
in the program.
Another potential research question is whether TANF eligible participants who
participate in ABE/GED programs are less likely to become TANF recipients (or
spend less time on TANF) than those who do not participate in ABE/GED programs.
The empirical demonstration of saving TANF dollars would represent one solid
justification for the continuation or expansion of TANF-funded ABE/GED participation.
The positive employment and enrollment outcomes shown for TANF eligible participants
in the current study, particularly among those who received their GED, increase
participants’ self-sufficiency, decreasing their need for TANF assistance. Merging
ABE/GED and Department of Family Services administrative data would allow us to
definitively answer these additional questions.
References
Adult Education and Family Literacy Act of 1998, WIA--Pub. L.
No. 105-220. Retrieved March 12, 2004, from
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.1385:
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2003). Table A-4. Labor force
status of the civilian population 25 years and over by educational attainment
[Data file]. Retrieved February 13, 2004, from
http://stats.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab4.htm
Cantu, R. (2003). What is the value of an education?
Texas Labor Market Review. Retrieved February 13, 2004, from
http://www.tracer2.com/admin/uploadedpublications/1042_tlmr0312art.pdf
Gosar, W. M. (1995, May). Wyoming unemployment insurance
wage records summary statistics: A new way to look at Wyoming. Wyoming Labor
Force Trends. Retrieved February 13, 2004, from
http://doe.state.wy.us/lmi/0595/0595a2.htm
Murray, S. (2004, March). Adult Basic Education (ABE)
program educational functioning levels. Wyoming Labor Force Trends. Retrieved
July 16, 2004, from http://doe.state.wy.us/lmi/0304/a2.htm
National Reporting System for Adult Education. (2001).
Measures and methods for the national reporting system for adult education:
Implementation guidelines. Retrieved February 13, 2004, from
http://www.nrsweb.org/reports/implement.pdf
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193. Retrieved March 12, 2004, from
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c104:H.R.3734:
Tyler, J. H. (n.d.). So you want a GED? Estimating the
impact of the GED on the earnings of dropouts who seek the credential. NASCALL
Research Brief. Retrieved February 13, 2004, from
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~ncsall/research/brief_tyler2.pdf
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003,
February 7). 2003
HHS poverty guidelines. Retrieved July 8, 2003, from
http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/03poverty.htm
Table of Contents | Labor Market Information | Wyoming Job Network | Send Us Mail
These pages
designed by Susan J. Murray.
Last modified on
by Valerie A. Davis.